<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!--Generated by Squarespace Site Server v5.9.2 (http://www.squarespace.com/) on Mon, 15 Mar 2010 21:53:07 GMT--><rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/" xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" version="2.0"><channel><title>StratexBlog</title><link>http://www.manigent.com/stratexblog/</link><description></description><lastBuildDate>Sat, 27 Feb 2010 13:33:01 +0000</lastBuildDate><copyright></copyright><language>en-GB</language><generator>Squarespace Site Server v5.9.2 (http://www.squarespace.com/)</generator><item><title>How is your PPS M&amp;A (Dashboard Designer) experience still relevant?</title><category>BI</category><category>Dashboard</category><category>PerformancePoint</category><category>PerformancePoint</category><category>SharePoint</category><dc:creator>Mark Woodall</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 02 Mar 2009 09:21:54 +0000</pubDate><link>http://www.manigent.com/stratexblog/2009/3/2/how-is-your-pps-ma-dashboard-designer-experience-still-relev.html</link><guid isPermaLink="false">239218:2726339:3158652</guid><description><![CDATA[I had a communication recently with an old partner who had, like me spent a lot of time learning and qualifying for their PPS certification. He wanted to know what relevance the qualification now has in the Microsoft certification process for a Microsoft Partner.]]></description><wfw:commentRss>http://www.manigent.com/stratexblog/rss-comments-entry-3158652.xml</wfw:commentRss></item><item><title>What do we do now that PPS Planning is off the shelves?</title><category>PerformancePoint</category><category>PerformancePoint</category><category>SharePoint</category><dc:creator>Mark Woodall</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 07 Feb 2009 13:49:23 +0000</pubDate><link>http://www.manigent.com/stratexblog/2009/2/7/what-do-we-do-now-that-pps-planning-is-off-the-shelves.html</link><guid isPermaLink="false">239218:2726339:2979814</guid><description><![CDATA[<p>Well, it was a bit of a blow. I had proudly done my research, worked for a MCTS qualification in PPS (which I might tell you is 80% Planning modules and 20% Dashboard Designer) and all for what? For Microsoft to pull it off the shelves which basically means there will be no new sales, clients or consultants working on the product. I have read loads of blogs and comments bitterly complaining about&nbsp;the reversal of fortune, but actually, if Microsoft thinks&nbsp;PPS Planning won't make it in the current climate, then there is not much we can do other than vent frustration. Now we need to look for alternatives.</p>]]></description><wfw:commentRss>http://www.manigent.com/stratexblog/rss-comments-entry-2979814.xml</wfw:commentRss></item><item><title>Another Microsoft Office PerformancePoint Server 2007 demo</title><category>PerformancePoint</category><dc:creator>Andrew Smart</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 12 Jan 2009 10:44:42 +0000</pubDate><link>http://www.manigent.com/stratexblog/2009/1/12/another-microsoft-office-performancepoint-server-2007-demo.html</link><guid isPermaLink="false">239218:2726339:2835645</guid><description><![CDATA[<p><object width="480" height="295"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/8gxW07AdejA&hl=en&fs=1"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/8gxW07AdejA&hl=en&fs=1" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" width="480" height="295"></embed></object></p>]]></description><wfw:commentRss>http://www.manigent.com/stratexblog/rss-comments-entry-2835645.xml</wfw:commentRss></item><item><title>Microsoft Office PerformancePoint Server 2007 demo</title><category>PerformancePoint</category><dc:creator>Andrew Smart</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 12 Jan 2009 10:41:39 +0000</pubDate><link>http://www.manigent.com/stratexblog/2009/1/12/microsoft-office-performancepoint-server-2007-demo.html</link><guid isPermaLink="false">239218:2726339:2835639</guid><description><![CDATA[<p><object width="425" height="344"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/kg3CLM77InY&hl=en&fs=1"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/kg3CLM77InY&hl=en&fs=1" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" width="425" height="344"></embed></object></p>]]></description><wfw:commentRss>http://www.manigent.com/stratexblog/rss-comments-entry-2835639.xml</wfw:commentRss></item><item><title>The Future of BI?</title><category>General BI</category><category>PerformancePoint</category><dc:creator>Andrew Smart</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 12 Jan 2009 10:37:28 +0000</pubDate><link>http://www.manigent.com/stratexblog/2009/1/12/the-future-of-bi.html</link><guid isPermaLink="false">239218:2726339:2835634</guid><description><![CDATA[<p><object width="480" height="295"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/MAbtc_PZOjs&hl=en&fs=1"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/MAbtc_PZOjs&hl=en&fs=1" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" width="480" height="295"></embed></object></p>]]></description><wfw:commentRss>http://www.manigent.com/stratexblog/rss-comments-entry-2835634.xml</wfw:commentRss></item><item><title>A short story about a PPS implementation</title><category>Dashboard</category><category>Excel</category><category>PerformancePoint</category><category>Project</category><category>SQL Integration Services</category><dc:creator>Mark Woodall</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 07 Jan 2009 16:15:45 +0000</pubDate><link>http://www.manigent.com/stratexblog/2009/1/7/a-short-story-about-a-pps-implementation.html</link><guid isPermaLink="false">239218:2726339:2816315</guid><description><![CDATA[<p><span style="font-size: 110%;">This entry&nbsp;was provoked by a question in a professional forum - so here is my response with some added bits.</span></p>
<h2 class="q"><span>Has anybody developed a "serious and working" (not prototype or such) budgeting infrastructure with PPS out there?</span></h2>
<p><span style="font-size: 110%;">Serious eh..? Yes, but I'm not sure whether the client is using it to budget seriously. The question implies a certain skepticism that PPS is really suitable or is in actual live use somewhere in the world (the questionner is from Italy). So here is my story of a serious&nbsp;implementation by way of proof but also as a reminder of the work involved. This is for a relatively straight forward single-company deployment which meant that I was directly involved in every part, so please forgive all the 'I did this, I did that' stuff.</span></p>]]></description><wfw:commentRss>http://www.manigent.com/stratexblog/rss-comments-entry-2816315.xml</wfw:commentRss></item><item><title>Configuring Staging database permissions</title><category>PerformancePoint</category><category>PerformancePoint</category><category>SQL Integration Services</category><category>SQLServer</category><dc:creator>Mark Woodall</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 05 Dec 2008 13:32:00 +0000</pubDate><link>http://www.manigent.com/stratexblog/2008/12/5/configuring-staging-database-permissions.html</link><guid isPermaLink="false">239218:2726339:2666279</guid><description><![CDATA[<p><span style="FONT-SIZE: 10pt; FONT-FAMILY: 'Arial','sans-serif'; mso-bidi-font-size: 12.0pt; mso-fareast-font-family: 'Times New Roman'; mso-bidi-font-family: 'Times New Roman'; mso-ansi-language: EN-US; mso-fareast-language: EN-US; mso-bidi-language: AR-SA">The standard Microsoft doco called 'PerformancePoint Server Operations Guide.doc' has some very useful info, but I found that <strong>some examples do not work without tweaks</strong>. This is the bit (around pages 39 of 374 !)&nbsp;about granting user permissions and access to the PPS staging database so that the data integration users who make SSIS (Integration services) ETL packages can run imports and stored procedures which work on the staging database.</span></p>
<p><span style="FONT-SIZE: 10pt; FONT-FAMILY: 'Arial','sans-serif'; mso-bidi-font-size: 12.0pt; mso-fareast-font-family: 'Times New Roman'; mso-bidi-font-family: 'Times New Roman'; mso-ansi-language: EN-US; mso-fareast-language: EN-US; mso-bidi-language: AR-SA">You will require sql administrator access to your SQLServer instance to perform these tasks, and need to know how to run SQL Server Management Studio. Below is a shot of the default users associated with a new PPS staging database.</span></p>]]></description><wfw:commentRss>http://www.manigent.com/stratexblog/rss-comments-entry-2666279.xml</wfw:commentRss></item><item><title>Labels and Names in PPS Models</title><category>Dashboard</category><category>Excel</category><category>PerformancePoint</category><category>SP1</category><dc:creator>Mark Woodall</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 28 Nov 2008 11:46:11 +0000</pubDate><link>http://www.manigent.com/stratexblog/2008/11/28/labels-and-names-in-pps-models.html</link><guid isPermaLink="false">239218:2726339:2618009</guid><description><![CDATA[<p>When constructing model components in PBM&nbsp;or adding data you have to <strong>consider how to name things</strong>. Labels have to be unique (across an entire model)&nbsp;and less than 40 characters (no funny stuff : _*()'@?/"!\-+{}[]) , Names (256 char)&nbsp;and Description&nbsp; (512 char) can be any unicode character. The temptation is to put something programmerish into the Label which imples order and relationship, and put the visible end-user&nbsp; text in the Name or Description fields.</p>
<p><strong>Schema labels</strong> - such as the PPS Application, Root site, sub-site (if used),&nbsp;dimension, and model labels are all used in making the Application table names&nbsp;and Analysis database / cube names. So keep it short and unique and avoid nasty characters if you want a hope of finding things in SQLServer. These schema labels also appear in Excel plug dialogues. Examples are shown in an earlier blog <a title="Local blog link" href="http://manigent.squarespace.com/pps2x/2008/10/30/defining-names-and-labels-in-performancepoint.html">here</a>.</p>
<p><strong>Member labels</strong> - The problem is that the member Label</p>]]></description><wfw:commentRss>http://www.manigent.com/stratexblog/rss-comments-entry-2618009.xml</wfw:commentRss></item><item><title>Making Current vrs Previous month trend values in PerformancePoint.</title><category>Dashboard</category><category>KPI</category><category>Modeller</category><category>PerformancePoint</category><category>PerformancePoint</category><category>Rules</category><category>Scorecard</category><dc:creator>Mark Woodall</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 13 Nov 2008 12:50:13 +0000</pubDate><link>http://www.manigent.com/stratexblog/2008/11/13/making-current-vrs-previous-month-trend-values-in-performanc.html</link><guid isPermaLink="false">239218:2726339:2558344</guid><description><![CDATA[<p><strong>A common requirement in a scorecard</strong> or chart is to provide a visual presentation of how the current period values compare to the previous period.<br />The simple calculation would be; <em>value of current period - value of previous period = movement</em> (or variance or trend etc..). If the result is negative then the value has fallen, if positive it has risen and if 0 then it has not changed. So we have 3 states which can be represented by an arrows indicator. - see scorecard image below.</p>
<p><span class="full-image-block ssNonEditable"><span><img src="http://manigent.squarespace.com/storage/screenshots/pps-trend-scorecard.png?__SQUARESPACE_CACHEVERSION=1226580983548" alt="" /></span><span class="thumbnail-caption" style="width: 565px;">Current vrs Previous month trend scorecard</span></span></p>
<p>How can this formula be applied in a Dashboard Designer scorecard?</p>]]></description><wfw:commentRss>http://www.manigent.com/stratexblog/rss-comments-entry-2558344.xml</wfw:commentRss></item><item><title>Making a KPI in Dashboard Designer.</title><category>Dashboard</category><category>KPI</category><category>PerformancePoint</category><category>PerformancePoint</category><category>video</category><dc:creator>Mark Woodall</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 06 Nov 2008 14:20:00 +0000</pubDate><link>http://www.manigent.com/stratexblog/2008/11/6/making-a-kpi-in-dashboard-designer.html</link><guid isPermaLink="false">239218:2726339:2558649</guid><description><![CDATA[<p>Here is a short animation about <strong>creating a generic KPI</strong> from a PerformancePoint generate cube and adding it to a new scorecard object in PerformancePoint's Dashboard Designer. I thought about making a running commentary, and then realised that it wasn't really necessary, because this is just a very basic point and click procedure. This is a 2:30min video called <a class="offsite-link-inline" href="http://www.screencast.com/t/g8tBhwtava" target="_blank">pps-kip-tumteetum</a></p>
<p>Alternatively download the flash file attachment below for the silent version.</p>]]></description><enclosure url="http://www.manigent.com/storage/upload/pps-generic-kpi.swf" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" length="3247519"/><wfw:commentRss>http://www.manigent.com/stratexblog/rss-comments-entry-2558649.xml</wfw:commentRss></item></channel></rss>